|
The IEA ETP data used in the SDA only provides carbon data as far as I know, how was it transformed to overall GHG data?
|
|
0
|
19
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
Is it correct that it is expected from an investor to have all the information needed in the temperature rating approach available himself, which in practice might prove to be quite challenging for e.g., large equity portfolios?
|
|
0
|
22
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
If investee companies have already set SBTs, can this be counted towards reaching an FI's portfolio coverage target or do new investees need to set SBTs?
|
|
0
|
15
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
When using the SDA tool for e.g., large equity portfolios, does every single company need to be entered individually or is there some other tool to do this on an automated basis?
|
|
0
|
23
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
What can financial institutions do if no data is available for some of the assets in a 100% required category, i.e., some listed equities or bonds?
|
|
0
|
21
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
A financial institution has preferred stocks of companies belonging to sectors not covered by SDA. In addition, none of these companies has been engaged with SBTi so it is not feasible to apply Portfolio coverage or temperature scoring
|
|
0
|
18
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
What is the rationale for 100% coverage for electricity generation, but 95% coverage from fossil fuel sector?
|
|
0
|
17
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
Where the requirement is 67%, does the FI choose which 67%? If so, does this raise a risk they will cherry pick the data inputs that make them look best?
|
|
0
|
11
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
For a number of asset classes SBTi is requiring 100% coverage. Please outline the rationale for this requirement. Would 67% not be more feasible given difficulties in obtaining data?
|
|
0
|
12
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
4 Could you please talk about why some activities are optional to include, and what FI's should consider when deciding whether to include them?
|
|
0
|
11
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
Do you foresee the "required", "optional" and "out of scope" to change in the future?
|
|
0
|
12
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
Bank's asset management divisions are currently not required to follow table 5.2 and set targets, on the funds they manage, how about asset manager division of the Insurance company?
|
|
0
|
16
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
Do FIs include any emissions for instruments they underwrite and securitize, or only investments held?
|
|
0
|
12
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
What flexibility will be allowed for different FIs looking to set a portfolio coverage target
|
|
0
|
17
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
For the assets of cat.15 that are out of the scope for reduction targets, for example motor vehicle, do you still recommend that the financial institutions include these emissions in their scope 3 GHG inventory?
|
|
0
|
11
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
Do you include also coking coal for steel production? In addition to coal for power. This needs to be phased out, too; producing about one third of all coal pollution and with renewable hydrogen there are now viable alternatives
|
|
0
|
12
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
Are Coal investment phase out and fossil fuel investments disclosures required to validate Targets? Indeed, these are specified under recommendations and additional guidance
|
|
0
|
12
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
5 Are there different requirements for different regions on the coal phase out, e.g., institutions in developing markets?
|
|
0
|
10
|
July 14, 2021
|
|
Loans to SME (<500 employee) is an optional category. So, we assume that all the corporate loans been required, concern only big companies (>500 employees)?
|
|
0
|
29
|
July 7, 2021
|
|
CRE Residential Mortgage Tool: Is there a plan to add tools that aligning to the IEA's NZ2050 scenario, and/or increased ambition beyond NZ by 2060/WB2D?
|
|
0
|
28
|
July 12, 2021
|
|
Can FI scope 1 and scope 2 reduction target be an intensity target, such as the one defined for the Real estate portfolio (i.e., reduction of scope 1 and 2 emissions linked to offices xx% per square meter by xxx from a xx base year)?
|
|
0
|
18
|
July 7, 2021
|
|
The Target Language Template in the submission form is articulated around targets for “asset classes” and “sectors”? How does this fit with the criteria on setting targets on “required activities”?
|
|
0
|
31
|
July 7, 2021
|
|
To what extent will SBT Net Zero guidance for FI’s be aligned with the already published IIGCC Net Zero Investment Framework for asset managers?
|
|
0
|
19
|
July 7, 2021
|
|
What additional asset classes will be added in the near future?
|
|
0
|
22
|
July 7, 2021
|
|
Are assets under management covered in the methodology or only owned assets by the institution? Does the asset class listed equity and bonds include both owned assets and assets under management?
|
|
0
|
27
|
July 6, 2021
|
|
Can I use CRREM to set targets for my real estate portfolios, instead of SDA?
|
|
0
|
67
|
June 24, 2021
|
|
Once the target for financial institution is submitted, how long will the approval process take?
|
|
0
|
55
|
June 8, 2021
|
|
For the SBT Portfolio Coverage - is a sector specific commitment mandatory or can we leave it at a portfolio level only? Additionally, within the target language, how do we specify which assessment method was used?
|
|
0
|
54
|
June 8, 2021
|
|
Is it ever compatible with the guidance to use a regional pathway that is less ambitious than the global pathway?
|
|
0
|
34
|
June 8, 2021
|
|
How do I approach the SDA method for asset classes with low PCAF data quality scores? For asset classes with a low PCAF data quality score (e.g. commercial real estate) how should we approach the SDA method?
|
|
0
|
36
|
June 8, 2021
|
